The OIC uses disposition categories to inform on the outcome of complaint investigations.
Following an investigation, the Commissioner found that the government institution failed to respect one or more of its obligations under the Access to Information Act.
Following an investigation, the Commissioner found no or insufficient evidence to conclude that the government institution failed to respect one or more of its obligations under the Access to Information Act.
The complainant is satisfied with the resolution achieved through the OIC’s intervention, or the matter central to the complaint is no longer at issue before the complaint has been fully investigated. For example, a delay complaint is resolved if the complainant receives a response to their request before the allegation of delay has been fully investigated. Likewise, a complaint about refusal of access is resolved if the complainant receives the withheld information at issue in the complaint before the allegation of proper application of exemptions has been fully investigated.
The complaint was withdrawn or abandoned before all the allegations were fully investigated. A complaint may be discontinued for various reasons. For example, the complainant may no longer be interested in pursuing the matter, or cannot be located to provide additional information critical to reaching a conclusion.